This entry was posted on March 23, 2013 at 11:26 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
This entry was posted on March 23, 2013 at 11:26 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
March 29, 2013 at 1:29 pm |
This picture is of course evidence of the harm being done to the animal kingdom by Gay Marriage!!!
Matthew 25:31-46
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+25%3A31-46&version=MSG
(please look up “irony” before flaming a reply 😉
March 29, 2013 at 3:07 pm |
You do understand that you’re misusing the slippery slope logical fallacy, right? A slippery slope logical fallacy is where you argue “A therefore B therefore C” where B does not necessarily imply C.
However, if A does imply B and B does imply C then A implies C. The inevitable outcome of decoupling marriage from heterosexual monogamy is multiple-partner arrangements. Pointing this out is not the slippery slope logical fallacy.
March 29, 2013 at 10:19 pm |
Asher, not all monogamy is heterosexual, as you must be aware. Homosexual marriages are also monogamous. So you can only say that multiple-partner arrangements result from decoupling marriage from monogamy. But that is of course obvious.
March 29, 2013 at 9:03 pm |
Countries where same sex marriage is legal
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage
Countries where polygamous marriage is legal
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_polygamy#Countries_that_recognize_polygamous_marriages
March 29, 2013 at 10:21 pm |
Thank you XAU. I see absolutely no overlap between the two groups, except in a couple of cases where polygamous marriages originating in group 2 are recognized by countries in group 1. This should assuage Asher’s anxieties about the slippery slope.
December 20, 2014 at 7:55 am |
The picture is stolen from my website. That’s a illegal act, please think about that. Greetings Matthias